INCLUDE_DATA

I decided to drop one of my classes here in Sweden as I didn´t have time to do both of the classes and my independent projects with my seminary in MN and try to learn Swedish, and have a life and post here.

I also am going to try and use a one hour timer to limit my time spent on the internet each day to two hours, one in the morning and maybe another in the evening.

This is the sort of discipline that I need to incorporate more into my life. Hopefully it will work well and I´ll be able to focus more on quality rather than quantity of postings.

dlw

I am volunteering with an outreach team tonight and tomorrow night at a celebration being held by the university that is next to my seminary here in Sweden. Earlier in a conversation, one of the Christian converts here in Sweden shared with me how he was part of all nighter church service that would minister to people as they left the bars. Often here in Sweden, it is only after people have drank a bit that they open up to others and are honest with their feelings and willing to listen. I´ll have a report of how it goes on monday.

Some stuff worth mentioning.
Christianity Today has a good article on what it is like to be a Christian in the Middle East today and how the move towards more democracy may mean more persecution for them.
There is now a ChristianCounterCultural magazine that looks quite interesting.
I´ve been posting a bit at Dixie Politics as part of my conviction on the need to reduce the regionism that has historically contributed to the extent of racism and the cultural wars in the US. Unfortunately, Bubba doesn´t seem to be interested in doing much more than writing a whiggish defense of all the actions of southern past. This really is quite sad.

And I also received the following from Save Darfur.

Important Darfur Legislation Now Before House and Senate Conferees

Negotiations on two crucial components of legislation to end the violence in Darfur are currently under discussion in the House and Senate conference on the Supplemental Appropriations Bill.

Your support helped get this language approved by the Senate, and now we must urgently support the inclusion of these issues in the final version of the bill that is being negotiated between Senate and House conferees.

One component requests an additional $53 million to help expand and strengthen the African Union mission in Darfur, plus $40 million for additional disaster aid; the other component reiterates that the atrocities taking place in Darfur are genocide, and calls for stronger sanctions against those responsible for these crimes.

Our website makes it easy for you to express these concerns and to urge action. When you fill out the information at the Save Darfur action center, we will send your customized letter (by email) to the leaders of the House conference team. We will also send a copy to your Representative, your Senators, and President Bush. (We provide this service free-of-charge.)

Because of the urgency of this matter, we also encourage you to call Congressman Hyde (202-225-4561) and Congressman Kolbe (202-225-2542) and urge them to keep these provisions to aid Darfur intact in the final conference version of the Supplemental Appropriations Bill. (If you have direct contacts with these Members or any other conferees, that would also be very helpful.)

I did this and would hope that others would do the same.
dlw

I am glad to hear that Tom Delay is likely to have to face the music for how he has abused the ethical rules of the House of Representatives. Incidentally, he attends the church my family attended when we lived in Texas twenty-some years ago when I was between the ages of three and nine. I was blessed with a renewal of some of my old friendships from that time and some of my old friends have grown fatigued of the culturally captivated Christianity of their area. I pray for them regularly.

I also wanted to let others know of a Democrats for Life of America set of proposals entitled the “95-10” initiative. Kudos to Rick Gruzca at Faith-Based Politics for a summary of how this idea has been received on the blogosphere. I am all for prevention measures, but do not think they should exclude some redefinition of when the human fetus is a legally protected human being. New visitors, if I have any, may find interesting my idea for how we may foster compromise in that regard.

dlw

I received a copy of the latest Prism E-pistle from Evangelicals for Social Action.
It included a letter from Ron Sider about Bush´s budget proposal. He wrote,

“When the king is concerned with justice, the nation will be strong, but when he is only concerned with money, he will ruin his country.”
Proverbs 29:4

Every budget is a moral document. Your family budget reflects what you value. President Bush’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2006 tells us what he values. As the House and Senate reshape the president’s proposed budget, they are telling us what they value.

Do evangelical Christians really want to support tax cuts for millionaires paid for by cuts in food stamps, healthcare, housing vouchers, and nutritional programs for poor Americans? Is that the meaning of compassionate conservatism? If evangelicals want to implement the new NAE declaration’s call to empower the poor to improve their circumstances, they will have to demand that the president and Congress reprioritize the 2006 budget. Eliminating proposed tax cuts for the richest 5 percent of Americans would make available tens of billions of dollars to empower the poor.

I appreciate how Sider sets out facts of the situation in the US and the consequences of the BushAdmin´s policies. I also went here and wrote letters to my elected officials that concerned my desire for better leadership that would make me able to be more proud about my country and its future. I also decided to write another letter to Ron Sider, as I think he and the NAE could help the situation some by taking a different tact to change the dynamics of US politics.
Here is what I wrote to Sider:

I was thinking/hoping that it would be good if Sider would perhaps admit that he was wrong before the elections to accept hook, line and sinker the cultural wars issues as they were framed by the religious right. He gave an awful amount of weight to these issues in his letter to e-pistle readers as part of an NAE-style “biblically-balanced” approach. I still don´t understand why we do not push to have these issues reframed so that they do not continue to crowd out so many other issues from being decisive in our elections!

I would suggest that in the future, it might be wise not to have the NAE be a special interest group. What if the NAE did more to condense and inform objectively its members of the political records of politicians, without assessing for them what a biblically-balanced choice would be, and tried to ensure more ethical conduct by the parties during elections? Now, that would do more to improve our witness to others than picking sides on various issues. If we’re going to champion reforms, perhaps it would be better to concentrate on reforms at level of the rules of the game. The key sorts of reforms I think would improve our witness to others would be to help reduce the importance of the freedom of $peech in our gov’t and to foster a more viable multi-party system.

We don´t need to claim to have “the” biblically-balanced approach to political activism. All we need to do is to affirm that an active involvement in politics can be glorifying to God if done in an ethical manner that is not dogmatic and seeks to widen the range of interests that potentially can be served by the government.

dlw

I´ve written to Sider before. I regret I did not get to talk to him much on this when I was at his conference this spring. He carries an enormous weight on his back as he strives along with Wallis to perform the prophetic role for the US and, particularly, white USEvangelical Christianity. But he don´t draw attention to the fact that we are all fallible in the specific sorts of reforms we advocate and how we frame and evaluate them. He, as an intellectual/analyst/activist, can point better to the consequences of how we act or fail to act on these matters and he, as a man of faith, can and should point out the need to appeal to biblically grounded moral norms to evaluate proposed policy changes. But we still see as through a mirror darkly, and should not privilege the theologian/analyst/activists judgment in our final considerations as to what Jesus would do.

dlw

I am reading right now a book titled Transforming Mission - Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission. You can find a readers guide to it, here. I believe that Missiology should be central for us Christians, as we deliberate on praxis and doxy, inasmuch as we should view all cultures, including our own, as mission fields. We also must reflect on past praxis to determine how we collectively and individually should let our lights shine before others. For me, the biggest example where there is a need for much more reflection on praxis is with Church-State relations. As I was reading Transforming Missions, it described the missiological shortcomings of post-millenialism and pre-millenialism. I think both views are serious misinterpretations of the Bible that reflect wishful thinking that the Bible would simply just settle what is right political conduct once and for all and the hermeneutical problems of understanding a text written two millenia ago. And yet, we can learn from the experiences generated by Christians acting from within these paradigms and allow their experiences to shape our own actions. One of the reasons I enjoyed learning about the work of John R. Commons, founder of Wisconsin Institutional Law and Economics is that he sought to learn from the lessons/failures of the Social Gospel movement´s activism and past political economic thought. He did this in a way that was quite practically successful in promoting institutional reform in the US.

An emphasis on Missiology can be eye-opening. As my NT prof said this past spring, it is important to remember that missiology is far more important and comprehensive than evangelism. We must not let an overemphases on evangelism distort our witness to the world and we must not forget that we must evangelize as part of how we make disciples of all nations.
dlw

I saw this movie twice this past weekend. I found it to be part science fiction, part teenage rebellion movie that mixes dark humor with an affirmation of familial and self-sacrificial love and that satirizes pat, easy answers to life´s difficult questions. I think it also affirms a belief in God, ultimately. Even though Donnie´s actions end up mainly ensuring that others may live as they were meant to live.

Anyone else?
dlw

I had a good weekend, visiting friends in Sweden.

Right now is a busy time for me and so I don´t expect to post so much. I am still sick some, but it´s not so bad right now and I hope to heal soon. I´ve been doing a lot of prayer for my spiritual, physical and emotional health lately. A while back, I was at the Refuge, a group of support groups when I heard a man tell his story of wrestling with addiction via the story of the demon-possessed man in Mark 5. I really liked the notion of retelling your story with a biblical story. Last night, I returned from spending a weekend with friends of my family to find that my bike had been vandalized. And so I had a long walk to get home, but during that walk I had a lot of time to think and pray. I guess I see myself as similar to the woman with the internal bleeding who touched Jesus in Mark 5. I´ve had a lot of issues from my past that have continued to torment me and failed to heal and so I´ve been visualizing what it would be like to reach out to touch Jesus´s cloak.

God knows I need to be renewed.
Anyways, I hope to post some pictures sometime in the future so do check in and consider possibly making a donation if you are able.

dlw

I just got a serious letter from Save Darfur.

New Analysis Claims Darfur Deaths Near 400,000
Experts estimate 500 people a day are dying
In the most comprehensive statistical analysis to date, experts have concluded that close to 400,000 people have died in Darfur since the conflict began over two years ago. The Washington-based Coalition for International Justice (CIJ) and experts from Northwestern and Toronto Universities estimate that 140,000 people have been killed by Sudanese government forces and their proxy militia and 250,000 Darfur civilians have died from either disease, starvation or exposure.
“This is the first thorough review of data which recorded deaths from violence, disappearances, disease, starvation and exposure during flight in the largest geographical area yet available in Darfur,” said John Hagan, the John D. MacArthur Professor of Sociology and Law at Northwestern University, who led the analysis of the estimated 140,000 deaths by violence.
Hagan and his colleague University of Toronto researcher Patricia Parker reviewed data culled from 1,136 interviews of refugees from Darfur conducted by the Coalition for International Justice last summer, as well as data presented in the World Health Organization’s survey of deaths in refugee camps last year. Based on their analysis of the combined data, they estimate that the number of persons who have died or disappeared between February 2003 to April 2005 is close to 400,000.
The initial CIJ survey was initiated by the US State Department and led the US government to conclude last September that the events in Darfur constituted genocide.
“These numbers continue to grow as the attacks persist and aid organizations are denied access to civilians in urgent need of international assistance,” said Stefanie Frease, CIJ’s Director of Programs, who led the international team that interviewed refugees from Darfur in Chad last summer. “Despite the death toll so far, not enough is being done to save the thousands who will inevitably die unless the world community supports the type of intervention needed to stop the killing.”
Analysis of the combined CIJ and WHO surveys reveals that about 15,000 deaths are occurring per month, or about 500 deaths per day.
The analysis of CIJ interviews was independently initiated by Hagan, Parker and CIJ.
-30-

Stefanie Frease
Director of Programs
Coalition for International Justice
529 14th Street, N.W., Suite 1187
Washington, D.C. 20045
tel. (202) 483-9234
fax. (202) 483-9263
www.cij.org

I am not sure what we can do, but I think we must do something more than what we are doing.
dlw

Gracias a PublicEconomics for a good post that links to a paper presented at Harvard that analyzes statistically the process by which the Cardinals in the Roman Catholic Church vote to determine who will be the next Pope.

The question they try to tease out of the data is how best to explain changes in voting patterns during papal elections.  Are changes in cardinals’ votes explained better by past voting with cardinals strategically choosing to back someone who is leading the pack, or are changes discernable from conversations as to what is the will of God between cardinals during break periods. 

The results are that the conversations during break periods have generally tended not to support the eventual winners.  The eventual winners have more often been determined by strategic voting, as cardinals come to support a candidate that has taken a significant lead.  The study remarks that one significant exception to this pattern was Pope John Paul II.

Whether this testifies to the will of God moving within the church is a far more open question. As I learned in my studies of history of thought in grad school, the traditional catholic approach to decision-making has been to argue endlessly and then all get behind whatever decision is finally made. From my non-Catholic perspective, strategic voting would more likely seem to value unity for its own sake, rather than per se being the result of listening to the movings of the Holy Spirit.  In my humble opinion, it would seem that the movings would more naturally evince themselves through conversations during break periods. 

And I strongly doubt one can presume that the RCChurch´s leadership selection process has been teleologically led by the Holy Spirit.  This is especially true when the fervency of its membership is seriously flagging in much of the world and its leadership of Cardinals underrepresents the underdeveloped world where the Holy Spirit is most moving.

dlw

As you may know, there is a new pope in Roman Catholicism, Pope Benedict XVl, formerly Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. As a USAmerican, I had been cheering for candidates, not unlike how so many people around the world cheer for US presidential candidates. And so I, along with others, had hoped for someone from the underdeveloped world as the next pope. Although, I know as a non-catholic it doesn´t per se concern me, but I do have a fair number of catholic friends and have interacted extensively with people from predominantly catholic countries, many of whom have fallen away from organized religion.

And so I am concerned about the way the RCChurch develops. I am concerned about how pope Benedict spoke of absolute morality and doctrinal orthodoxy in a speech he made yesterday. This concerned me, inasmuch as I find that language about absolute morality has easily been used to cover fallible ecclesial governance in the past. I also believe that doxy and praxy are intertwined and that we Christians are fallible in the determination of our missiological focuses, or how best we should let our lights shine before the world. God does not change, but our theologies definitely do change. Theology, in my opinion, is a second-order discipline ideally entailing the reconciling of our received world-views with the world-view of Yeshua of Nazareth as remembered by the early church and recorded in the Bible. Our theology matters because it inevitably affects how we act, with heresies like what les LaHayes propagate, leading us to harm our public witness to others and setting up barriers to our ability to form personal relationships with nonChristians wherein we can share about our faith.

A friendly, but telling letter about the new pope is written by Johann Christoph Arnold of the Bruderhof Communities . He gives a personal example of how the former Cardinal was moved by the pleas of the descendants of Mennonite dissenters that were persecuted by the Catholic Church. He also quotes him as saying,

The church must renounce worldly principles and standards in order to accept the truth, and the way it must go will always lead to some form of martyrdom. It is important for us to realize that we cannot bring about unity by diplomatic maneuvers. The result would be a diplomatic structure based on human principles. Instead, we must open ourselves more and more to God.The unity that God brings about is the only true unity. Anything else is a political construction, and it will be as transitory as all such constructions are. This is the more difficult way, for in political maneuvering, people themselves are active and believe they can achieve something. But we must wait on God, and we must go to meet him by cleansing our hearts.

This reminds me somewhat of Greg Boyd´s message in his Cross and the Sword sermon series. My problem with it is that, as I understand it, how we resolve our disputes about how best to let our lights shine before the world as the church is inevitably “political” or subject to some disagreement among devout Christians. This is because we do not have an unchanging universally accepted standard on all such conduct and are not led teleologically by the Holy Spirit in the development of our traditions on such matters. We must be political and attempts to portray certain arrangements as apolitical can ultimately be very political and hazardous to the faith. It is one thing to be moved to tears by the abuses of church authority in the past, another thing to accept that our institutional ecclesial forms of governance may still promote abuses of authority today.

It´d be interesting to see how Ratzinger and/or Boyd would respond to Jim Wallis when he wrote

The place to begin to understand the politics of God is with the prophets, the ancient moral articulators in the Scriptures who claimed to speak in “the name of the Lord.” What were there subjects? Quite secular topics really - land, labor, capital, wages, debt, taxes, equity, fairness, courts, prisons, immigrants, other races and peoples, economic divisions, social justice, war, and peace-the stuff of politics! And whom were the prophets usually speaking for? Most often, the dispossessed, widows and orphans (read: poor single moms), the hungry, the homeless, the helpless, the least, last and lost.

Likewise, it would be interesting to hear Wallis respond to the questions raised about the potential harmful consequences for Christian Churches/ Organizations that get institutionalized, incorporated into the extant political system, as they seek to change the direction of the wind politically.

dlw
ps, it seems Nike is doing its own confessional on its past sins. Now some heat should be given to the top athletes that promoted it in the past to donate some of their money to help compensate the families of former Nike workers and to promote better working standards in the world today.
dlw

Next Page →