An Interesting Jewish View of Narnia
Posted by dlw in Uncategorized at 7:49 pm |
Permanent Link
Kudos a Carlos a Haysoos Politicas, for this well written article , “Bad Faith in the Land of Narnia”, by Jewish cultural and film critic, Sheerly Avni. The interesting thing about it is the author describes how her faith in God was nurtured very much by the writings of C.S. Lewis against his parents’ “pessimism: God doesn’t exist, and He’s out to get us anyway“. While she didn’t become a Christian, she avoided becoming an atheist, in part due to the concept of God in the writing of Lewis. She describes for us her informed outsider’s view of why the Narnia books are so special.
Narnian Christianity operates on a symbolic, imaginative level. Religious fundamentalists of all creeds insist on literal interpretations of ancient texts. But creative readings of those same texts offer us a moral blueprint for making our way in the world, and that alone should make the film’s content an antidote to the ugly anti-intellectualism of fundamentalist Christianity.
She also provides us clues that the hypocripsy and anti-intellectualism of much of US Christianity is what kept her Jewish. She wants liberals to boycott LWW because of how its earnings will go to billionaire Philip Anschutz, the chairman of Walden Media. Anschutz, according to Avni,
is a Bush-loving, moralizing, hypocritically dogmatic Christian–a socially conservative devil. His business entities bankrolled the group that put Colorado’s notorious anti-gay constitutional amendment on the ballot in 1992. (Voters approved the measure but it was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.) He’s been investigated for allegedly cheating his employees and shareholders (many of his charitable contributions are part of a settlement deal made after a scandal at Qwest, one of his companies), and in 2002 Fortune magazine put him atop its list of greediest corporate executives.
She ends by affirming how, while Lewis was a troubled but believing Christian who used his lively imagination to search for moral purpose, Anschutz parallels the White Witch with his venal blend of greed and self-righteousness. (Although I checked out the list of movies made by Walden and in the works and it looks pretty good. He does seems committed to taking advantage of how Hollywood is out of tune with much of the United States in terms of their religiosity and views on morality. He apparently helped clean up the movie Ray to deemphasize his womanizing and drug-use from. )
I love reading how non-Christians see Narnia. I find their reactions to be a promising source for doing apologetics in the spirit of CS Lewis, with perhaps less of an emphasis on “mere Christianity” and more of an emphasis on Christian dialogue about our differences on how we should communicate the identity and significance of Yeshua of Nazareth in our context.
dlw
The 18th of December, 2005 at 9:23 am
From The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong to Get Ahead, by David Callahan:
“Philip Anschutz is yet another business leader who publicly embraced religion and “family values” — while indulging in greed and financial chicanery at the office. A billionaire who is the largest owner of movie screens in America, Anschutz is a religious man who has crusaded against homosexual rights and the medical use of marijuana. He has bankrolled a variety of Christian conservatives and invested in prayer radio. Yet as the founder and chairman of Qwest Communications, a telecommunications firm, Anschutz ranks among the most corrupt insiders of the late 1990s. He sold nearly $2 billion of Qwest stock as it plunged in value from $63 a share to $3. As these sales took place, many in a secretive fashion, Qwest was encouraging its employees to hold on to their own stock and to build their retirement plans around 401(k)s heavy with Qwest shares. Anschutz was later investigated by Eliot Spitzer’s office and eventually agreed to give up $4.4 million in illegal gains from his shady business dealings without admitting any wrongdoing.”
Really, how praise-worthy is it to cite someone as a “generous donor” when they are being generous with money that was obtained unethically - if not illegally - from those with far less to spare?
The 18th of December, 2005 at 9:42 pm
I was withholding judgement some, as I didn’t know what to make of Anschutz. Your quote helps me see that Sheerly Avni was more probably right in his assessment of him.
dlw
The 19th of December, 2005 at 3:30 pm
FYI — Sheerly Avni is a woman.
The 19th of December, 2005 at 9:22 pm
Thanks for the info.
dlw