<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is the Best Work of American Fiction of the Last 25 Years?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sodsbrood.com/junk/2006/05/17/what-is-the-best-work-of-american-fiction-of-the-last-25-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sodsbrood.com/junk/2006/05/17/what-is-the-best-work-of-american-fiction-of-the-last-25-years/</link>
	<description>The community blog portal for sodsbrood.com</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dhalgren</title>
		<link>http://sodsbrood.com/junk/2006/05/17/what-is-the-best-work-of-american-fiction-of-the-last-25-years/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>dhalgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 12:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodsbrood.com/junk/2006/05/17/what-is-the-best-work-of-american-fiction-of-the-last-25-years/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>There's a discussion on the NYT site about the list that you might want to read. One of the comments is how very traditional the list is, so perhaps we should not be suprised that Updike is on it. It has been ages since I read Rabbitt, and I unwilling to voice much opinion on him for that reason. 

I really ought to read Beloved this summer. That does seem to be THE novel at the moment (well, for the last ten years in the academy). Roth sounds like fun, too, especially that Lindbergh novel you were reading...How did that one end up being?

Underworld, bt, is very different than White Noise. Not as focused or personal and not as obsessed wit pop culture theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a discussion on the NYT site about the list that you might want to read. One of the comments is how very traditional the list is, so perhaps we should not be suprised that Updike is on it. It has been ages since I read Rabbitt, and I unwilling to voice much opinion on him for that reason. </p>
<p>I really ought to read Beloved this summer. That does seem to be THE novel at the moment (well, for the last ten years in the academy). Roth sounds like fun, too, especially that Lindbergh novel you were reading&#8230;How did that one end up being?</p>
<p>Underworld, bt, is very different than White Noise. Not as focused or personal and not as obsessed wit pop culture theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://sodsbrood.com/junk/2006/05/17/what-is-the-best-work-of-american-fiction-of-the-last-25-years/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 15:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodsbrood.com/junk/2006/05/17/what-is-the-best-work-of-american-fiction-of-the-last-25-years/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>I'm planning on reading Roth's new novel, "Everyman," sometime this summer.  I'm a slow, slow reader, however, so we should probably skip reading it together.  You'd be finished with it before I read the first chapter.  I also want to read "Underworld" and "Beloved," now that they have been recalled to my attention.  I read "White Noise" last summer.

I was most surprised by Updike's inclusion.  He has always seemed a minor figure, to me, mainly because his fiction is so traditional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m planning on reading Roth&#8217;s new novel, &#8220;Everyman,&#8221; sometime this summer.  I&#8217;m a slow, slow reader, however, so we should probably skip reading it together.  You&#8217;d be finished with it before I read the first chapter.  I also want to read &#8220;Underworld&#8221; and &#8220;Beloved,&#8221; now that they have been recalled to my attention.  I read &#8220;White Noise&#8221; last summer.</p>
<p>I was most surprised by Updike&#8217;s inclusion.  He has always seemed a minor figure, to me, mainly because his fiction is so traditional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
