A Pilgrim’s Digression

Comeday morm and, O, you’re vine! Sendday’s eve and, ah, you’re vinegar!

Monday, 30 June 2003

Filed under: — Matthew @ 8:08 am

In a ZDnet article from the 25th, Gates: Technology Isn’t All Big Brother, Bill Gates claims that contrary to Orwell’s vision of the future, technology will actually ensure our privacy. The really funny moment, though, comes in the remarks of the speaker immediately following Gates:

John Hamre, president of CSIS and a former deputy secretary of defense, defended TIA in an afternoon speech that followed Gates’ remarks. “I think we need a domestic surveillance organization in this country…I think they’re really on to something,” he said, talking about Adm. John Poindexter’s plans to create the TIA system.

A “domestic surveillance organization” … now that’s a moniker that won’t get past the focus group. I need a drink of Victory Gin.

Thursday, 26 June 2003

Filed under: — Matthew @ 8:19 am

Yesterday, on my way home from work, I got off the train just as people were boarding the #24 bus that I am usually too late to catch. I got in line and waited to get on board. The temperature has been steadily increasing here in Washington, and yesterday was a miserable day. As I stood in line to get on the bus, I noticed a man lying unconscious on his back on the concrete sidewalk in the bus shelter. He seemed to be sleeping; his chest rose and fell rhymically, as if in sleep, but the hot evening sun was shining full on his face. His face was red and sweaty, but he seemed to be sleeping comfortably. He didn’t look like a beggar, though that was my first thought. He didn’t have any bags around him, as beggars usually do. His head lay flat on the concrete, with nothing under it all. His clothes were dirty, but not excessively so. He wore a yellow, plastic band on his wrist, as if he had just been released from a hospital. Other people boarding the bus were looking at him, too. The bus had pulled up and opened its doors so close that one had to practically step over the man in order to get on the bus. One young man, younger than myself but more professionally dressed, even smiled as he looked at the man. It was the kind of sarcastic leer with which one looks at a protester disrupting a politician’s campaign rally with a display of public nudity, as if to say, ‘What an idiot! Only in the city!” No one said anything about the man lying there. Each person boarded the bus, paid their fare, and sat down. I didn’t say anything about the man lying there. I boarded the bus, paid my fare, and sat down. The bus sat there for perhaps two minutes. Finally, a late-arriving passenger boarded and said to the driver, “Shouldn’t you call 911 for that guy?” The bus driver didn’t say anything, but picked up his CB and said into it, “Uh, I’ve got a man lying on the ground in the bus shelter at Takoma Station.” Meanwhile, the woman who had prompted him to act was preparing to sit down. She looked at all of us, the other passengers on the bus, and said, “He could be dying or something.” We all stared blankly back at her, saying nothing. She sat down. “24, I’ve got just one question for you,” the dispatcher said to the bus driver, “Is he breathing?” The bus driver glanced out the door of the bus and replied, “Yeah, his chest is moving up and down.” “OK. Carry on, 24.” With that, the bus driver shut the door, put the bus in gear, and pulled away from the station. I did not witness the denouement to this story, if there was one.

Tuesday, 24 June 2003

Filed under: — Matthew @ 4:26 pm

I’ll attribute my long hiatus from my blog to the aftereffects of the war. Innui is the common state of modern man; even war can galvanize our attention for only so long, and then afterwards, we sink back into slothful rumination.

Today, I noted in the New York Times a curious photograph of President Bush and President Musharraf of Pakistan at Camp David. The accompanying article, Bush and Pakistani Leader Hail ‘Special Relationship’, explains that Musharraf is the first South Asian leader to visit Camp David. My memory is as bad as Winston Smith’s, I admit, but at one time, didn’t Musharraf seize power in Pakistan via a military coup? Is his country no longer a military dictatorship? Alliances of expediency are what lead us into our biggest problems. We supported Bin Laden during his fight against the Russians in Afghanistan. At the same time, we supported Saddam in his war against Iran. An alliance with Musharraf might be expedient now, in order to capture Bin Laden and defuse Al Qaeda, but will the future look back on this time and ask the same questions we, today, ask about the Reagan administration and its dealings with Bin Laden and Hussein? If Pakistan and India ever go to war again, whose side will we be on?