Home > Film Review > Film Review: “The Magdalene Sisters”

Film Review: “The Magdalene Sisters”

Last night I watched a disturbing film called The Magdalene Sisters. There is a CBS news article from 2003 which elaborates on the background of the film.

Set in Ireland in the mid-nineteen-sixties, the film follows the lives of four girls who are sent to what was known as a “Magdalene Laundry,” where girls were sent as punishment for sins of the flesh (both real and imaginary). A Magdalene Laundry was operated for profit by the Catholic Church; it amounted to nothing more than a prison.

The first girl we meet, Margaret, is raped by her cousin in one of the first scenes of the film. Her father delivers her to the Laundry himself, where she will live for the next four years until her brother is old enough to take responsibility for her and thus “liberate” her from the “care” of the Nuns. The rape scene is interesting on a number of levels. It occurs at the reception following a family wedding. As Margaret is raped, a priest is singing a traditional Celtic love tune while playing the Bodhrán . Afterwards, she tells a family member immediately, and while the music is still playing we see her father and other men of the family gathering as if to punish the boy. In fact, it is the girl they are planning to punish.

Another girl, Rose, has had a baby out of wedlock and is in the hospital with the child. Her mother refuses to speak to her or look at the child, and her father arranges for the baby to be adopted and Rose to be sent to the Laundry. The scene in which her baby is taken is heartbreaking. Her father struggles to hold her back, and the violence of the scene mimics other scenes of violence and rape elswhere in the film.

The third girl, the ironically named Bernadette, is an orphan living at the (again ironically named) St. Attractus Orphanage. She is a flirt and is viewed by the Nuns as a potential temptress of the boys. She, too, is sent to the Magdalene Laundry.

The fourth girl is already present at the laundry when the other three girls arrive. Her name is Crispina, which considering the fate of her namesake, Saint Crispina, does not bode well for her. She is a bit simple, but her innocence makes her a prime target for abuse. She has been sent to the Laundry for having a child out of wedlock. Her sister cares for her little boy and brings him to the Laundry gate occasionally so that Crispina can see him as she hangs the laundry to dry. Crispina and her son wear matching St. Christopher medals, but Crispina does not even know the name of her son. They were parted before she had a chance to name him.

These four girls, then, arrive at the Laundry to suffer what can only be described as a fate worse than imprisonment. Prisoners have certain rights, and prisoners know when, or if, they are going to be released. The girls at the laundry cannot leave unless a relative is willing to claim them and take responsibility for them. And so they work away their lives at washing other people’s laundry.

Crispina, it turns out, is the girl we end up having the most sympathy with. She is abused by everyone, including the priest who comes to the school to celebrate mass. Margaret happens to see Crispina giving the priest oral sex and it is this scene, more than any other, which precipitates the plot to its conclusion.

The head of the laundry, Sister Bridget, is in some ways a stereotypical Nun. Her brutality is expected; her greed is something else. When the three girls arrive at the laundry, they are shown into Sister Bridget’s office where she is counting money, rolling it into tight wads of bills, and placing it in cake tins. Whenever she is in her office, she seems always to be counting the Laundry funds. Her first act upon meeting the girls is to preemptorily change Rose’s name to Patricia. We also see her deliver many brutal beatings with whatever object comes to hand. The Laundry is a place where naughty girls literally wash away their sins, or else have them beaten out of them.

In a scene near the end of the film, we see another side of Sister Bridget which is an ironic contrast to her brutality. On Christmas Day, an important business man brings a film projector and a movie to the Laundry and the girls are allowed to watch the movie. In a preface to the film, Sister Bridget explains how she loved films as a girl, especially Westerns. Although the film showing that day is not a Western, when the movie title appears on the screen, Sister Bridget claps and screams giddily: it is The Bells of Saint Mary’s, an Ingrid Bergman feature in which the stunning Sister works to save a condemned parochial school. The girls watching the film note how Sister Bridget weeps at the film’s sappier moments.

The film has a reasonably happy ending for the three girls who came to the laundry after Crispina, but for Crispina, there is no happiness. In that way, the film is both depressing and honest. When Margaret’s brother comes to rescue her, in a moment when another Director might have resorted to tired cliché about the powerless woman being saved by the heroic man, Margaret’s anger flashes at her savior. “Where have you been for the past four years?” She snaps. “Growing up,” the brother says. “Well you should have grown a little faster,” Margaret retorts. It is this kind of blunt honesty which makes this movie stand out. Another example of it is in the character of Bernadette, with whom we sympathize, but who is not naturally a sympathetic character. She steals Crispina’s St. Christopher medal because she does not believe the girl has suffered enough. Her anger at her own suffering results in her desiring the suffering of others.

Unbelieveably, the last Magdalene Laundry in Ireland closed down as recently as 1998. When the property was sold off, the sordid story of what took place in these prisons came to light. On the property were the unmarked graves of 133 women essentially given into slavery by their families.

To me, an American man living in the early years of the twenty-first century, this movie represents the evil that can result when religion and state become intertwined. Ireland was for many years a kind of theocracy. One has only to view this film if one wants to see what it really means to live under theocratic rule. The practical result of a state religion legislating morality and ascribing punishments not for crimes, but for moral transgressions, is a horrible transgression of both human law and God’s law. In truth, no one would have been holier in the eyes of Christ than the “whore” Crispina. Her fate at the hands of the powerful is much the same as the martyr for whom she is named. Thus is it always: power corrupts and destroys the good.

Categories: Film Review Tags:
  1. April 8th, 2005 at 00:56 | #1

    I saw this film a while ago. Very bleak, depressing. And scary that it actually happened.
    Not too far removed from a time where this was still possible, either.

  2. April 8th, 2005 at 22:49 | #2

    I have not seen this movie yet, but will keep my eye out for it. It sounds very thought provoking and I would be interested in learning more about the history of these laundries. To your knowledge, did these type of prisons exist outside of Ireland as well?

  3. April 9th, 2005 at 16:21 | #3

    I think it is/was common in Catholic countries to send girls to Nunneries or convents when they were made pregnant out of wedlock or raped. I don’t know that there were laundries outside of Ireland. These laundries were basically what one would have to call prisons fr women who had committed sins of the flesh. That seems to me an institution peculiar to Ireland, but I could be wrong. However, I think it’s a fair warning of what could happen in this country under Church rule. The last of these laundries closed down only in 1998! That is an amazing fact, to me! Even if the last one had closed down in 1970, that is still too close to our own time period for my comfort.

  4. April 9th, 2005 at 18:15 | #4

    I have a family member that grew up Catholic and was raped and became pregnant in the 1930′s. She wasn’t sent to anywhere in particular because her family shut the doors on her. As a result, she had to fend for herself. Meanwhile, the man who raped her, her brother-in-law, did not seem to have the same struggles as she did. I wonder if these actions were more society driven than Church driven. As a Protestant, it does make me wonder how the family/Church could just turn their back on this person. She had many emotional struggles until her death and I am almost certain that these struggles were a direct effect of her treatment by her family and the Church.

  5. K
    July 24th, 2007 at 11:32 | #5

    Yes these places existed outside of Ireland. No this doesn’t happen “under church rule”. I don’t think it has to do with church and state being intertwined at all! I think it is ignorant to blame these situations on a government or a church….we as a people allow this stuff to happen and until ALL of us are willing to get off our butts and do something about it will happen again and again big or small because we the people are too busy looking the other way in our own busy little lives. People are always looking for a “cheap or easy” way out of an uncomfortable situation and we as a whole have become a throw away society. This stuffs happens today under our noses in prisons in “reform” schools in all the great places we send people that we don’t want to deal with anymore.

  6. SUE
    September 20th, 2008 at 10:54 | #6

    THE CHURCH SHOULD BE MADE TO PAY BACK ALL THE MONEY MADE FROM THE MAGDELENE LAUNDRY ALSO ALL NUNS INVOLVED INT THIS SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE HOW COULD ANY NUN LET THIS HAPPEND ALSO HOW COULD ANY NUN HIT A CHILD

  1. No trackbacks yet.