Michael Graham Fired
http://www.washingtonpost…5082201255.html
Washington radio station WMAL-AM fired talk show host Michael Graham yesterday after he refused to soften his description of Islam as “a terrorist organization” on the air last month.
Graham had been suspended without pay from his daily three-hour show since making his comments July 25. The station had conditioned his return to the midmorning shift on reading a station-approved statement in which Graham would have said that his anti-Muslim statements were “too broad” and that he sometimes uses “hyperbole” in the course of his program. WMAL also asked Graham to speak to the station’s advertisers and its employees about the controversy.
But Graham refused both conditions, prompting the station to drop him.
According to WMAL, Graham said “Islam is a terrorist organization” 23 times on his July 25 program. On the same show, he also said repeatedly that “moderate Muslims are those who only want to kill Jews” and that “the problem is not extremism. The problem is Islam.”
Not unsurprisingly, Graham resorted to a Liberal argument in his defense, saying that his right to freedom of speech had been abridged. Graham said, “As a fan of talk radio, I find it absolutely outrageous that pressure from a special interest group like CAIR can result in the abandonment of free speech and open discourse on a talk radio show.”
Some other Conservative talk show host should tell Graham what they have been telling Liberals for years: you have a right to free speech in this country, but you do not have the right to a forum for your speech.
I don’t listen to talk radio like I used to, but the few times I’ve listened in the past month since Graham made his comments, I haven’t heard any of the big names mention Graham’s case. Boortz mentions it today briefly at his blog. Limbaugh’s website is always a day behind, so no mention of it there.
Graham must be feeling a bit crestfallen that he has been summarily dismissed, and his talk radio colleagues have uttered a collective yawn. Perhaps in private they all feel a little more vulnerable, but probably not. Graham lacked one thing that Limbaugh and others have to provide them insulation from a firing: Graham was local, not nationally syndicated, and he did not bring in anywhere near the advertising dollars that Limbaugh hauls in to his network.
Good riddance to Michael Graham. A small victory for reasoned speech, a great loss for stupid speech.
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>





A small victory, but a victory nonetheless. Now, if we could just do something about a certain prominent Republican minister calling for the assassination of foreign leaders…
Comment by Scrivener — Wednesday, 24 August 2005 @ 11:33 am
Graham has published an article over at TownHall.com. attacking those who sacked him. Of course, in the article he mostly whines about the double standard Conservatives are always crying about. Liberals can slander Christianity til they’re blue in the face, but slander Islam and you get fired.
The only double standard in talk radio is between those who can make money for their employers, and those who can’t. If Graham had been more popular, the station would have considered him too valuable to fire. Obviously, the station managers figured they stood to lose very little by letting him go.
Neal Boortz is reporting Graham has already found another job at a station in Los Angeles, which doesn’t surprise me really. The guy has moved around quite a bit, mostly because he ends up saying or doing soemthing inflammatory that gets him fired. If he were a school principal or teacher shuffling around from job to job after being fired, eventually no one would employ him and he’d have to find some other profession. In talk radio, the more “controversial” you are, the better, though.
For some reason, I can’t get the link to that Graham article to work, so here it is for you to copy and paste.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GuestColumns/20050823.shtml
Comment by Matthew — Wednesday, 24 August 2005 @ 11:50 am