A Literary Cat Fight
I came across the following story in the New York Times this morning, In Literary London, the Strange Case of the Steamy Letter. Recently it was revealed that A. N. Wilson, a biographer of the former British Poet Laureate, John Betjeman, utilized a phony letter from the poet to prove his contention that the poet had a homosexual affair with a friend during World War II.
The fake letter, purportedly the ingenious work of a rival Betjeman biographer, Bevis Hillier, can be viewed below.

Wilson had no idea that the letter was phony, but he probably should have. Maybe I have grown unromantic in my middle age, but the letter is just a bit over the top: “I have a Romaunt of the Rose feeling?” Please spare me. That’s obviously someone who is not a poet trying to write a love letter such as he or she thinks a poet would write.
Also, as it turns out, the first letter of each sentence, except the first and last two sentences, spells out an obscene insult against Wilson. Pulling off a caper like this requires a personal interest in Betjeman’s life and Wilson’s work.
As the Times reporter writes:
The trick was complicated and planned well in advance. Mr. Wilson told The Sunday Times that he received a copy of the fake Betjeman letter in the mail about two years ago from someone claiming to be Eve de Harben, a cousin of Honor Tracy (a real friend of Mr. Betjeman). Eve de Harben said that the original letter was owned by an American collector.
Mr. Wilson had no reason to doubt its authenticity, he said. He put it in the book, at the end of the chapter titled “Betjeman at War.â€
No reason to doubt its authenticity? That seems a little odd. Someone purporting to be a cousin of a deceased friend of Betjeman’s mails him a copy of a letter that explosively confirms the biographer’s supicions about the poet’s sexuality. The fact that it is a copy should be the first tipoff that Wilson needs to verify the authenticity of the original with the owner.
And as if that weren’t enough, it turns out that the name of the mysterious person who sent him this copy of a Betjeman letter, Eve de Harben, is an anagram of “Ever been had.” Furthermore, when the biographer tries to return the copy of the letter to Ms. de Harben, it is returned “addressee unknown.”
Hmmm. Do you think he should have investigated the authenticity of that letter? It sounds to me like the letter provided exactly the information Wilson wanted, and so he didn’t question its authenticity. Why question something that confirms the truth of what we already believe?
The incident does not speak well for Wilson’s reputation as a biographer, which may have been the point of his rival sending him the letter. Wilson, described as “waspish” by the Times writer, could better be described as prideful and mean. He mocked Hillier in a newspaper column, describing him as “some old bachelor in a Hiram’s Hospital, smock-clad like a pauper in the reign of Henry VIII, dripping resentment like the dottle from a smelly churchwarden’s pipe…”
Hillier in turn described Wilson as a bully. It sounds to me like Wilson got exactly what he deserved.
So what was the obscene message encoded in the fake letter?
“A. N. Wilson is a shit.”
Well, at the very least, he is a fool. A fool with a big vocabulary (what the hell is a “dottle?”), but nonetheless a fool.


