Three Four
All day, I am reminded of it. As I dressed this morning, I listened to WMAL on the AM radio, and every five or ten minutes I heard the date: “And here’s the news for Tuesday October 16, 2007.” And later, “And here’s your weather for Tuesday October 16, 2007.”
It’s going to be partly cloudy today in Washington, by the way. High near 78 degrees.
When I arrived at work, I checked my messages. “New message, on, Tuesday, October 16, 2007…” the woman’s pre-recorded voice said in the halting, punctuated syntax of machines.
My wife called me at work to say good morning, and she mentioned the date, as well. What day is it? Well, they say it’s my birthday.
I feel pretty good about it. It’s not as big a deal as past birthdays, though I still feel unbearably old, sometimes. I was listening to a Bruce Springsteen interview on 60 Minutes, the other evening, and something Springsteen said really struck me. The interviewer asked him about the breakup of the E Street band in the nineteen-eighties. Springsteen replied sagely, “We all have stories we’re living and telling ourselves. And there’s a time when that narrative has to be broken because you’ve run out of freedom in it. You’ve run out of places to go.” This is the way he justified not just a career move, but what his friends in the band saw as an abandonment of them.
What I found truly wise about that statement was the understated idea that we create the narrative of our lives. That’s a rather more pro-active, less fatalistic, view of human life than I am used to professing. Yet there is truth in it. In some ways, creating a narrative of who I am and why I am is exactly what I’ve been doing for all these years, and the narrative has always been a sad one–maybe not even an honest narrative, which I have nonetheless believed (to my detriment).
I have expressed the desire to break that narrative in one way or another here–either through my stated intention of never writing seriously again, or my intention of removing this blog, or in any number of other ways. Hearing that Springsteen comment solidified the idea in my mind that if we do indeed create a narrative in which we live, perhaps we can revise the narrative, too. One cannot change the past; one can change one’s interpretation of it.
Oddly, just as I have been thinking about making a quietus of the past, I have been dreaming of my early childhood in Point Pleasant, West Virginia. Now more than 20 years in the past, that stage of my life comes back vividly to me at night. There is nothing lurid or surreal about these dreams, except the incredible detail of the dream. In my dream, I am walking through the house of my then-best friend, Mac. I am an adult, but the house is the same as it was then, in the early eighties. There is green shag carpet; a counter in the kitchen with brown vinyl covered bar stools; a large console TV on the floor with an Atari 2600 on top of it; dark, wood paneling on the walls. Mac’s dog Chewie (named after Chewbacca of course) runs out to greet me, a large, brown, wooly mutt that jumps on me and licks me in the face. But other than Chewie there is no one home. I wander this empty house– not even my own childhood house–looking into all the rooms and taking in the richness of detail in which my memory has recreated this place in a dream. The depth of detail is amazing, to the point that I look into Mac’s bedroom closet and see many of the toys he and I played with during the summer afternoons we spent together. The records on his stereo rack are the ones I remember listening to with him as a boy: David Bowie, the Police, Weird Al Yankovic.
It’s all there. So many years have passed, yet it’s still there. I feel old, today, as might be expected; but in memory, and in dreams, I still feel ten years old.
8 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>





Happy Birthday Matt! Ah, the inevitable passage of time. I understand your wanting to break from old patterns and identities. I have no deep wisdom to impart except to say I have enjoyed your blog for the past few years. You have talent and an interesting perspective. I hope you find what you are looking for. But if you do, won’t life be boring?
Comment by Grant — Tuesday, 16 October 2007 @ 9:33 pm
Happy birthday!
I think we just end up one big ball of memories and it doesn’t hurt to hang on to them, but at the same time, move past them.
That’s interesting, that you were in the past, but there was nobody there but you and the dog. Nobody will ever be in that place of your memory but you.
Comment by Mel B — Wednesday, 17 October 2007 @ 12:49 am
As usual I thought of your birthday a week ago and then promptly forgot again! Sorry
I’m going to send you a PDF file of a play currently playing in New York that I was able to get my hands on in a rather surprising fashion. It deals with some of your ideas above about narrative, and change.
Comment by Todd — Thursday, 18 October 2007 @ 8:03 pm
I’m sorry I’m so late to the party. Been neglectful lately…
But anyhow, happy birthday. I agree with Mel B. on the big ball of memories thing. That’s all we have, that’s all we are in the end, so I say, indulge on occasion.
The Springsteen comment is fascinating. There are the stories we tell people as we try to make sense of the events of our lives. What becomes interesting is when a seismic shift in thinking or behavior or attitude causes one to step back and scrutinize their narrative. “I am a woman X who beleives X whose dreams are X.” Then Y happens–in your case, you completely reconsider the writing thing. Then you think of all the things you might’ve left out in order to make the narrative more tidy, or then you mistrust your current reimpressions of those events long past, or… it’s a fascinating thought indeed.
Comment by Heather — Friday, 19 October 2007 @ 9:28 pm
Also, is it bad that I saw the title to this entry and wanted to add the words “Seven Mary” and an “and” to it?
Comment by Heather — Friday, 19 October 2007 @ 9:29 pm
You’ll have to explain that last one
It went right over my head! CB call signs?
Comment by greypilgrim — Saturday, 20 October 2007 @ 7:08 am
Yep. CHiPs reference–Larry WIlcox and Erik Estrada’s CB calls were Seven Mary three and four.
such a loser, i know…
Comment by Heather — Saturday, 20 October 2007 @ 2:57 pm
Wow, now that is some esoteric cultural information, there. You impress me with the breadth of your knowledge, Youngling!
Comment by greypilgrim — Saturday, 20 October 2007 @ 3:52 pm