Home > Life as I (don't) understand it > Proverbial Knots

Proverbial Knots

My step-sister was married on Saturday, in Charlotte, North Carolina. We drove down on Friday. It was quite an interesting, if exhausting and at times tedious, experience.

The groom was a young man from the Philippines; his family is entirely American-Filipino, and devout Catholics. My step-sister is from one of the coal-mining counties in central West Virginia. She met her husband at UNC-Charlotte and, with trips to the Philippines and a conversion to Roman Catholicism, he has apparently quite altered her horizons.

The wedding ceremony itself was a mixture of Catholic and Filipino traditions. It lasted nearly two hours–which is where the tedium part of the weekend begins to appear–but overall, it was interesting to witness. At the very least, I will never see something of this nature again in my life.  We’re getting to that age now where funerals are becoming more common than weddings anyway.

Since my wife and I were married in an empty court room, with only a handful of her family present and no one from my family, wedding ceremonies fascinate me in a “Why do people do this?” kind of way.

In this particular case, after much of the wedding mass was finished, the Filipino ceremony began and, as I said, it’s unlikely I will ever see anything like it again. It involved rope, a veil for the groom, and plenty of candle lighting.

After exchanging vows and being pronounced man and wife, the bride and groom knelt on a kneeler to one side of the altar. Two family members came forward and tied the two newlyweds’ hands together while reciting some words about the symbolism of the act.

Then two other family members came forward with what looked to me like a double hangman’s noose. One noose was placed around the bride’s neck and the other loop around the groom’s neck. In my opinion, the nooses really weren’t cinched tight enough to symbolize the true bondage of marriage, but apparently no one wanted the two youths to actually suffer. However, considering how long the two of them had to kneel, trussed up like a cow and bull, I imagine they were far from comfortable.

Finally, two more family members came forward with a large veil and draped one end over the bride’s head and the other over the groom’s, pinning it to the shoulder of his tuxedo. Still, the two of them had to kneel while the Priest droned on. More family members came forward and lit candles, other candles were blown out at some point, children grew restless, adults began to mutter under their breath.

Then there was the liturgy of the Eucharist and the Priest had to explain the whole business of who can and cannot receive the Host. The bride and groom received communion, still on their knees, and when the Father put it in her mouth I thought of Paddy Dignam’s funeral, from Ulysses…well, never mind about that.

Somehow I have got to stop associating Christian communion with oral sex. Forgive me, Lord.

Anyway, I was sitting on my family’s side of the church, and no one got up for communion, or the blessing that could be substituted, so I was trapped in my pew. I converted to Catholicism myself in college, but I still could not have taken communion, since it has been years since my last confession. I am not prepared, to use the Priest’s words. Still, I would have gone up for a blessing, if others in my row had done so.

Brendan, who was sitting with the groomsmen, did go up and following their lead held out his hand for a wafer. The Priest knelt down and whispered to him for a moment, then marked his forehead and blessed him and sent him on his way. The ironic thing is that Brendan, too, could have received communion, having been baptized Catholic at birth. We even named him partially after a Catholic saint.

Eventually, the wedding did end. Brendan had to stay at the church for pictures, and Lynn and I headed off to the reception hall to make sure we had good parking. The reception was a typical American affair with plenty of free booze, food that was probably pretty good but which I can’t remember because I was drunk (all I can recall is that the mashed potatoes had skins in them), and lots of noise.

Maybe the noise was heightened by my drunkenness, but it seemed like I could barely hear anything anyone said to me. And I certainly couldn’t hold a conversation with anyone, not that anyone over the age of 21 was fit for conversation.

I’ve always wondered what the servers must think, having to work a party like that where everyone is roaring drunk and generally incoherent. I’ll bet either their tips really suffer, or else they make extra in tips because people are overly generous in their stupor.

Although I wasn’t looking forward to traveling for this wedding, overall it wasn’t a terrible experience. I still wonder why people put themselves through the trouble and expense. I hesitate to say that wedding ceremonies are a whole lot of nonsense. If lighting a candle and blowing it out makes someone feel special, by all means do it. If being tied up with your bride is symbolically important to you, by all means, go right ahead. It might be good practice for later.

However, wedding ceremonies are a whole lot of nonsense. If Lynn had wanted a ceremony, I would have gone through with it to please her, but it’s something I have little appreciation for. Fortunately we are of like minds on that subject.

Like elaborate funerals, weddings are an industry unto themselves, but I am hardly the right person to criticize someone else for spending money to make themselves feel good. It’s one day in a lifetime–one day that costs thousands of dollars, but ultimately it’s one day that some people want to remember forever, or at least until the divorce.

  1. May 20th, 2009 at 08:59 | #1

    Hah! I love the bit with ropes around their necks!

    The wedding industry is pretty ridiculous, and having researching some of the symbolism that goes along with many wedding traditions, I’m glad we didn’t exactly give in to most of that nonsense.

    Spend money on something useful, like a down payment on a house and a nice honeymoon. That seems more sensible to me.

    But at least you had the benefit of free booze.

  2. May 20th, 2009 at 15:42 | #2

    Maybe we’re all curmudgeons here. I’m not quite as hard core as you about weddings and symbolism, but overall I’m with you. Thousands of dollars, one day… the cake alone for most people is probably more than a few months’ of housing. I can understand the urge for a fancy day, and to be at the center of it all, especially if you’re a woman, trained always to please another and to be in the background, but the waste and the attitude linked with a traditional wedding, weddings that aren’t nearly so unique as one would like to think, seem pretty pointless to me.

  3. May 20th, 2009 at 16:06 | #3

    There are unique weddings, but interestingly, the unique weddings typically cost less…or nothing at all. There was a wedding in a Taco Bell recently, for example. Talk about skimping on the reception!

    To some extent, the people who pay lots of money for weddings don’t want “unique” anyway. They want extravagant; they want everyone to be awed by the opulence. But unique? No. That’s not so much a factor as simply impressing people. I’ve also always wondered to what extent women compete with each other when it comes to weddings. There are always a host of bride’s maids and other female hangers-on at weddings, and I wonder if the bride’s extravagance is a way of saying to her friends, “Top this, Bitches!”

  4. May 20th, 2009 at 19:00 | #4

    I’m not saying there aren’t unique weddings. I’m saying that the very expensive, traditional wedding isn’t nearly so unique as some like to fool themselves into believing. People like to think that their traditional wedding is unique because, say, everyone wore red instead of wine, or because they blew out a candle instead of whatever else it is that they do. Or unique simply because they are involved. But many who go the traditional route spend a lot of money to make sure that every detail is the same as everybody else’s traditional wedding. It’s a lot of money spent to make sure that *you* are Cinderella this time, and perhaps to get the family off your back. On this point, we agree: It seems pretty pointless to keep spending all this money to redo the same ceremony over and over again, and for it to be your friends this time who are rendered “inadequate” by the display of money spent.

  5. November 14th, 2009 at 05:14 | #5

    Call me a cynic but with one in three marriages ending in divorce maybe they should have kept the money to pay for the lawyers.

  1. May 20th, 2009 at 09:22 | #1